Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 39
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46-47

Expanding the reach of electronic prescribing: A call to action


UNT Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Date of Web Publication18-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Blake Wassom
3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Res Bldg, Office 302E, Fort Worth, Texas 76107
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/digm.digm_3_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Wassom B, White A. Expanding the reach of electronic prescribing: A call to action. Digit Med 2018;4:46-7

How to cite this URL:
Wassom B, White A. Expanding the reach of electronic prescribing: A call to action. Digit Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Jun 21];4:46-7. Available from: http://www.digitmedicine.com/text.asp?2018/4/1/46/232707



Dear Editor,

The emergence of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and electronic prescribing in recent years has contributed to improved patient health outcomes and greater efficiency in the dispensing of prescription medications. However, implementation has been met with challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where slow adoption of evidence-based prescribing patterns and poor infrastructure play a critical role.[1] Commonly cited barriers for developed countries include acquisition and maintenance costs, insufficient training, lack of standardization, and the relevance and timeliness of clinical alerts.[2],[3]

Electronic prescribing offers several benefits compared to traditional handwritten prescriptions including the ability to interface with clinical decision support (CDS) at the point of order entry. In a 2013 review article, Holloway et al. reported that in primary care settings of developing or transitional countries, only 50% of medical interventions were in accordance with standard treatment guidelines.[4] Inappropriate utilization of medications remains a serious problem, one which might be remedied in part by broader implementation of CPOE with CDS and e-prescribing. This technology also reduces the potential for medication errors, a grave concern to health-care systems worldwide. Illegibility and lack of completeness are factors that contribute to medication errors. E-prescribing can mitigate such risks by reducing transcribing errors and facilitating completeness. Other studies have reported cost savings, improved patient safety, and greater coordination of care as a result of e-prescribing.[5]

Each health-care system is unique, and barriers to implementing health information technology should be addressed on a case-by-case basis. However, low- and middle-income countries can look to the successes of developed countries in furthering the implementation of CPOE and e-prescribing. The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 created a 5-year program to incentivize the utilization of electronic prescribing in the United States. Over this period, the percentage of prescribers using e-prescription software in the United States increased from 7% in 2009 to 70% in 2014.[6] Governments of developing countries may consider promoting the adoption of e-prescribing by providing legal and financial incentives to prescribers.[7]

Health information technology has revolutionized modern medicine. The benefits of CPOE and e-prescribing are well-documented in the literature, but much work lies ahead in making it universally accessible. Regardless of the current challenges, health systems should develop a tailored strategy to more fully implement health information technology into the prescribing process.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Akhlaq A, McKinstry B, Muhammad KB, Sheikh A. Barriers and facilitators to health information exchange in low- and middle-income country settings: A systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2016;31:1310-25.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hahn A, Lovett A. Electronic prescribing: An examination of cost-effectiveness, clinician adoption and limitations. Univ J Clin Med 2014;2:1-24.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Moxey A, Robertson J, Newby D, Hains I, Williamson M, Pearson SA, et al. Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: Provision does not guarantee uptake. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:25-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Holloway KA, Ivanovska V, Wagner AK, Vialle-Valentin C, Ross-Degnan D. Have we improved use of medicines in developing and transitional countries and do we know how to? Two decades of evidence. Trop Med Int Health 2013;18:656-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Esmaeil Zadeh P, Tremblay MC. A review of the literature and proposed classification on e-prescribing: Functions, assimilation stages, benefits, concerns, and risks. Res Social Adm Pharm 2016;12:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gabriel MH, Swain M. E-Prescribing Trends in the United States. ONC Data Brief, no. 18. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2014. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/oncdatabriefe-prescribingincreases2014.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 29].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Samadbeik M, Ahmadi M, Sadoughi F, Garavand A. A copmarative review of electronic prescription systems: Lessons learned from developed countries. J Res Pharm Pract 2017;6:3-11.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed144    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]